• Pay and Benefits

    by Published on 06-14-2010 09:30 PM
    Categories:
    1. Pay and Benefits

    The Post-9/11 Veterans Educational Assistance Improvements Act of 2010 sponsored by Sen Akaka, Daniel K. [HI] unfortunately does not go far enough in permitting transferrability of unused educational benefits to USPHS Officers. The changes do not change the wording in the original Act that refers to eligible members as Armed Forces members.

    The USPHS must still rely on a decision by the VA General Counsel, who interpreted the statutory provisions as expanding the definition of ‘Armed Forces’ in 38 U.S.C.101(10) to also include USPHS and NOAA for purposes of benefits administered by VA. The agency concluded that service as a commissioned officer of USPHS or NOAA meets the ‘active duty in the Armed Forces’ service requirement in section 3311 of Title 38, U.S.C. The VA said, “We agree that commissioned officers of PHS and NOAA are eligible for benefits under the Post9/11 GI Bill.”

    Even though the Improvements Act of 2010 has eliminated language that disallowed the Secretary of Defense from authorizing the Secretary of Health and Human Services from permitting an individual described as a "member of the Armed Forces" to elect to transfer benefits to one or more dependents, the Secretary of Defense still has the authority to make this authorization under the Improvements Act.

    This is concerning and clearly not enough changes have been proposed to eliminate the possibility that USPHS Officers will be denied the authorization to utilize the 9/11 GI Bill and the ability to transfer benefits to dependents of USPHS Officers. To those officers who wrote letters to assist COA in getting this far, it seems that the fight for clear language that allows parity is not over yet.
    Published on 05-03-2010 07:58 PM
    Categories:
    1. Pay and Benefits
    2. General Interest

    By JESSE J. HOLLAND (AP)

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court ruled Monday that the family of a now-deceased immigrant who was denied medical care for cancer while in custody cannot sue federal medical officials for damages.

    The law clearly states that the federal government, not individual federal medical personnel, must be the defendant in lawsuits arising out of claims of harm by federal employees during the course of their official duties, the high court ruled in an unanimous decision.

    "We are required ... to read the statute according to its text," said Justice Sonia Sotomayor, writing for a unanimous court.
    Salvadoran immigrant Francisco Castaneda was denied a biopsy for a painful penis lesion while in prison in California, despite outside specialists' recommendations.

    According to his attorneys, Castaneda was treated with ibuprofen, antihistamines and antibiotics and was given extra boxer shorts for a penis lesion that bled and festered. His penis later was amputated but by then the cancer had spread and he died.

    The federal government has admitted liability for medical negligence. But Castaneda and his estate also sued individual U.S. Public Health Service medical officials for damages.
    The government says its medical personnel have absolute immunity against lawsuits for their official actions.

    Congress in 1970 passed a law gave immunity to Public Health Service doctors who treat immigrants in detention. Under that law, Castaneda's survivors can only sue the federal government under the Federal Tort Claims Act, which bars jury trials and punitive damages and limits economic damages to those allowed under state law.
    A federal judge and the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco refused to throw out the lawsuit, however. The high court on Monday reversed that decision.
    Castaneda spent eight months in state prison after being convicted in 2005 of possessing methamphetamine with intent to distribute. He complained about the lesion while at the San Diego Correctional Facility, and again when he was transferred to immigration custody in San Pedro, Calif., because he was in the United States illegally.
    Castaneda informed Immigration and Customs Enforcement staff in 2006 that a "lesion on his penis was becoming painful and growing," a federal judge said. But a government doctor would not admit him to a hospital, calling a biopsy "an elective outpatient procedure."

    After the American Civil Liberties complained in 2007, a doctor performed a biopsy and said Castaneda likely had cancer.
    ICE decided to release him 11 days later. Castaneda went to a hospital and was diagnosed with metastatic squamous cell carcinoma. Less than a week later, his penis was amputated.

    He died a year later.

    The case is Hui v Castaneda, 08-1529.

    Copyright © 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.

    Link to the story...
    by Published on 01-05-2010 09:40 PM
    Categories:
    1. Pay and Benefits

    The few areas of the country that get cost of living adjustments are seeing a drop in 2010 compared to 2009. Check the attached files or from http://www.defensetravel.dod.mil/perdiem/cc_city.html.

    New York, Staten Island, and Detroit are set to increase but most other location adjustments will drop.

    The Defense Finance and Accounting Service has posted the official 2010 military pay tables on its website:

    http://www.dfas.mil/militarypay/militarypaytables/2010MilitaryPayTable34.pdf

    The BAS for 2010 remains unchanged at $223.04. The BAH rates for 2010 are posted at this website:

    http://www.defensetravel.dod.mil/perdiem/bah.html


    Categories:
    1. Pay and Benefits


    Stay informed with free Military.com newsletters. These newsletters offer a wealth of important, free information.
    by Published on 01-01-2010 12:13 AM  Number of Views: 95 
    Categories:
    1. Pay and Benefits


    Information on the Post 9/11 GI Bill courtesy of the IAVA - Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America (IAVA) is the ...